It's a simple question!

It doesn’t take a Ph.D in logic to figure out that the decision to abolish Passport Canada just doesn’t make sense!

Today, we officially launched a campaign to inform the public about the Harper Government’s decision to scrap Passport Canada. We’re pretty sure we won’t need the services of Captain Obvious to make our case: it just doesn’t make sense to fix what ain’t broken!

To drive the point home, we created a pretty awesome infographic and we’re encouraging members of the public to share their passport stories with us. Since 99% of passports are delivered on time or earlier, we’re expecting a lot of really great stories.

Stay tuned for more!

For more background on this topic, check out our recent article: Government abolishes Passport Canada.

Brace yourselves: they're coming for it!

Brace yourselves: the conservatives are coming to take away our sick leave!… if we let them!

Yes, it’s Public Service Week, and how thoughtful of Tony Clement to drop a big flaming bag of poo on our doorstep. Really, Tony, you shouldn’t have.

If you’re concerned about the attack on the rights we fought for (and you should be!), we highly recommend reading through the facts on sick leave collected by the PSAC.

There’s a lot of misinformation going on out there – it’s up to us to set the record straight!

Let’s tell Minister of Gazebos Tony Clement that he’s not going to steal our sick leave!

Building stronger connections

There’s a lot of enthusiasm in PSAC regional offices right now; regional reps and education officers want to make sure that our Locals are well-equipped to have one-on-one conversations with members.

“We need to harness the full strength of our membership,” said Shelina Merani, an acting education officer in the NCR. “Building stronger connections between members is crucial.”

Crucial indeed – the current government seems hell-bent on attacking unions and taking away the benefits we fought for.

Merani hopes union activists will sign up in large numbers for the upcoming membership engagement courses. In the NCR, there are courses taking place in English on June 11 and 17 and in French on June 18.

Over in the Prairies, Carm Chan, a regional representative in Edmonton, said she’s offering campaigner training in a variety of ways.

“We’re going directly to the locals,” said Chan. “We’re holding training on Saturdays, during evenings… we’ve even staggered the 3-hour session across three lunch breaks!”

And in the Atlantic, Regional Representative Janice Grant said most Locals in Nova Scotia were trained on how to connect with members during leadership meetings. Now that the Locals know the basics, regional reps in Nova Scotia are providing campaigner training to the Locals who request it.

Grant said the training is being offered in a variety of ways in order to better accommodate members’ schedules.

“We want Locals to understand what they should be doing to reach each member,” said Grant.

For more information on how training is being delivered in your region, consult your PSAC regional website or contact your regional representative.

$25M to destroy our museum

“You’re taking a Rolls-Royce, and you’re chopping off the roof and tearing out the backseats so you can turn it into a pick-up truck.”

That’s how Lorne Holyoak of the Canadian Anthropology Society described the Harper government’s plan to change the Museum of Civilization, yesterday, during a meeting of the standing committee on Canadian Heritage.

“We do not support the gutting of the crown jewel in our collection of museums. It would be a terrible mistake with long-term consequences,” added Holyoak.

Yesterday’s committee meeting was the single opportunity for the committee to discuss Bill C-49, which would rebrand the museum at the tune of $25 million and significantly change its mandate. The NDP did propose a motion to hold two more meetings on the subject, in order to interview more witnesses, but the motion failed thanks to the Conservative majority.

The Museum’s former President and CEO, Victor Rabinovich, was called as a witness; he described the new museum’s mandate as “narrow and parochial.”

“As it now stands, the CMC does a very extensive job of portraying Canadian history,” explained Rabinovich. He estimates that three quarters of the exhibition areas are already dedicated to Canadian history.

Rabinovich believes these can be improved without radically changing the museum.

A number of witnesses were also concerned that the language of the bill would greatly minimize the importance of research.

“It would be possible, under this language, for there to be no research undertaken within the museum itself,” said Holyoak. “And it appears planned that research may become an adjunct to exhibitions once they are decided upon rather than the informed and critical basis from which they arise.”

James L. Turk, executive director of the Canadian University Teachers Association, deplored the lack of engagement of the professional community of historians, anthropologists and archeologists in the planning of the museum. He believes this lack of consultation is partly to blame for the flaws within the bill.

For example, the new mandate would do away with the notion of increasing “critical understanding” to simply “understanding.”

“The removal of ‘critical understanding’ is one concern,” said Turk.“Promoting critical understanding of history is an essential goal of any great museum. Providing visitors with critical understanding of history means offering them an opportunity to consider different points of view – the opportunity to criticize and analyse the past, and to re-examine traditional viewpoints rather than simply venerating national heroes.”

Rabinovich echoed Turk’s concerns, noting that one word makes a big difference when a museum has to point to the legislation in order to justify every penny spent, whether to the Auditor General, Treasury Board or the Department of Canadian Heritage.

“The way the words are chosen is really important. It’s not window-dressing,” said Rabinovich.

“Critical understanding is an academic expression meaning the ability to criticize, to ability to engage with knowledge and challenge it,” explained Rabinovich.

“You have on the one hand the ability to engage, to debate, to argue and, on the other hand, the ability to distribute information to educate.”

Solidarity with Foreign Service Officers

Members of the Professional Association of Foreign Service Officers officially walked off the job today. If you work for the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, we highly recommend reading the April 4 update (below) on how to continue your work while supporting the strike.

The April 17 update follows :

Our brothers and sisters at the Professional Association of Foreign Service Officers have now been on strike for three weeks. Our union continues to firmly support their actions.

National President Doug Marshall is writing a letter to Assistant Deputy Minister Nadir Patel insisting that senior management and heads of mission respect Patel’s earlier instructions. On March 20, Patel advised, via email, that “local strike committees must be composed of non-represented senior managers from the EX and unrepresented groups.”

By back-tracking in this instruction and asking our management consular officer members to do what is clearly EX-level work, the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade is making life very uncomfortable for our members. These requests must stop immediately.

As this drags on, management consular officers will find themselves doing more work. That’s why we’re urging all PSAC members who are seeing an increase in their workload to document their situation. We want to ensure that you are claiming (and being paid for!) any overtime worked.

It also ensures that management consular officers, who are already doing more than their share of the work, document their workload in case something falls through the cracks. We simply can’t do it all!

Finally, this will ensure that after the PAFSO work actions are over, we can demonstrate how Treasury Board’s reluctance to bargain fairly with PAFSO had a negative impact on management consular officers.

Our members who work away from home are already coping with an enormous strain in their day-to-day lives. We urge the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade to get back to the bargaining table.

If you have any questions, please use your personal email to email Regional Vice-President Heather Brooker at hbrooker97@gmail.com

The April 4 update follows:

Our brothers and sisters at the Professional Association of Foreign Service Officers recently voted in favour of strike action. The Union of National Employees stands in solidarity with these members and calls on the Government of Canada to negotiate in good faith.

Many of our members work side-by-side with foreign service officers in Canadian embassies across the globe and at headquarters. For these members, it’s business as usual at the embassy and at 125 and 111 Sussex. Since this strike does not affect PSAC members, they must report to work and perform their regular duties.

While crossing a picket line is usually frowned upon, our members are obligated to report to the workplace. We encourage you to support your colleagues by walking the picket line with them outside your normal work hours. Better yet, drop by with some coffee and water!

This is a good time to explain your situation; you support their strike but you’re nonetheless obligated to show up to work. Your colleagues should understand your situation.

However, if you feel intimidated or have any concerns about your safety, step away from the picket line and call your supervisor. Your manager must provide you with a safe way of getting to work.

You should also be vigilant against being asked to perform work normally done by PAFSO members. If that does happen, obey your manager and contact your shop steward or union representative immediately.

As a PSAC member, you should not be involved in any strike strategy committees – that’s management’s job! Your role is to follow the directions that flow from these committees while making sure you don’t perform work normally done by your striking colleagues.

For more information on this strike, please visit the Professional Association of Foreign Service Officers’ website. Your regional team and members of your local executive should also be in a position to provide you with more information.

Finally! SSO Arbitration dates

The Public Service Labour Relations Board has officially set dates to hear the case of regional office members working at Statistical Survey Operations; the bargaining team will present its case on November 11 and 12, 2013.

The field interviewer group is still waiting to find out when the board will hear its case.

In its latest communication, the Public Service Alliance of Canada was clear: the bargaining team is prepared to return to the bargaining table at any point – but for that to happen, management will have to agree to a fair process when it comes to assigning work hours and provide wages that are comparable with public servants doing similar work elsewhere.

T-shirts sporting the slogan “Respect for our years of service” have been distributed to both regional office and field employees; the bargaining team is asking for SSO members to wear these during Public Service Week – preferably on June 12.

And we’ve also heard that, for field employees, training sessions are an especially good time to wear those t-shirts!

To find out more, please consult the SSO bargaining section of the PSAC website.

For more stories on SSO Bargaining on our website, click here.

National Aboriginal History Month

A government bent on assimilation; that’s what our nation’s Aboriginal Peoples had to fight for more than a century. To talk about Aboriginal Peoples’ history, in a human rights context, means recognizing that for many years, the Canadian government’s goal was to make Aboriginal People incapable of directing their destiny – unable to resist assimilation.

Shortly after Confederation, the government began to force Aboriginal People into ‘becoming civilized’. The Constitution Act gave the federal government responsibility over ‘Indians’. The government then gave itself the business of determining who was and who wasn’t ‘Indian’.

Who was and wasn’t a ‘status Indian’ became a complicated thing. Indian status was passed down from fathers; if only your father was Indian, so were you. If only your mother was, then you weren’t. A status Indian woman who married a non-status man was suddenly not considered status Indian anymore. That policy stayed in effect until 1985.1

Many status Indians automatically also lost their status as a result of graduating college or university.

Band councils were established, but mainly to displace the dominance of elders. By undermining the elders, the Indian Act was designed to weaken Indian communities and make them easier to control.

“Despite this show of respect, the Indian Act allowed band councils limited authority. Indian agents could remove from office chiefs whom they considered unsuitable and overrule band council decisions with which they disagreed.”2

The government also attacked Aboriginal Peoples’ spirituality and cultural practices. Powwows and potlatches were banned until 1951. Government officials and missionaries felt that these practices “were preventing Aboriginal people from assimilating into Canadian society.”3

The government also restricted Aboriginal Peoples’ mobility.

“A pass system was introduced after the 1885 rebellion, confining Indians to reserves unless they procured a ‘pass’ from the Indian agent stating their place of travel, reason, and duration of visit. This pass system was completely extralegal and recognized as such by all Crown officials.”4

The pass system was nonetheless enforced by the North-Western Mounted Police, thus preventing traditional gatherings and further confining First Nations People to reserves. It made it impossible or aboriginal communities to work together to form a resistance.

Residential schools were another key mechanism by which the government hoped to assimilate Aboriginal Peoples. Children were separated from their families so they could be ‘changed’ away from their parents’ influence. These schools punished students severely for speaking their own language.

But the government didn’t have the resources to administer these schools, so they arranged for churches to do the work.

“The brutal treatment in the schools is said to have resulted in the deaths of some 50,000 native children, with countless others becoming victims of serious physical and sexual abuse.”5

In 1904, Dr. Peter Bryce was appointed Medical Inspector to the Department of the Interior and of Indian Affairs. Three years later, Bryce conducted inspections of 35 residential schools in the three Prairie Provinces. His report, Bryce revealed a surprising rate of sickness and death among the children. Among his recommendations, Bryce urged the government to “undertake the complete maintenance and control of the schools, since it had promised by treaty to ensure such.”

But the report was swept under the rug. Frustrated by the government’s inaction, Bryce resigned and, in 1922, published his findings in a book entitled The story of a national crime.

“This story should have been written years ago and then given to the public,” wrote Bryce in the book’s epilogue.6

“Today I am free to speak,” he added, after explaining that, after resigning from his position, he was no longer bound by the civil service’s oath of office, which had been the only thing keeping him silent for so long.7


[1] Henderson, William B. The Indian Act. Canadian Encyclopedia

[2] Berry, Susan & Brink, Jack. (2004) Aboriginal Cultures in Alberta: Five-hundred Generations. Edmonton, Alberta: McCallum Printing Group, Inc.

[3] Idem

[4] Harring, S. (2005) There Seemed to Be No Recognized Law: Canadian Law and the Prairie First Nations. In Knafla, Louis A. and  Swainger, Jonathan (Eds.), Laws and Societies in the Canadian Prairie West, 1670-1940. Vancouver, B.C.: UBC Press.

[5] Akhavan, Payam (2012) Reducing Genocide to Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.

[6] Bryce, P.H. (1922) The story of a national crime, as retrieved from http://www.archive.org/stream/storyofnationalc00brycuoft/storyofnationalc00brycuoft_djvu.txt

[7] Idem

Injured Workers: a painful identity

On top of dealing with their physical pain, injured workers often have to grapple with a new sense of identity. According to Sharon-Dale Stone, an associate professor of sociology at Lakehead University and the principal investigator for a study on injured workers, there’s a stigma associated to being an injured worker.

Her paper, entitled Workers Without Work: Injured Workers and Well-Being, looks at how injured workers’ well-being suffers as a result of being deprived from work. Stone and her team of researchers conducted twelve focus groups in Western Ontario to obtain first-hand accounts on how their lives were impacted by their injuries.

“For me, personally, it was gratifying to be able document these stories because I had known for a long time about all the horrible things that had happened to injured workers,” said Stone during a phone interview. “And by documenting what they go through and publishing it, I would be in a position to make some small level of change.”

Injured workers are often met with a sense of distrust – as if all they want to do is stay home and get paid. But Stone’s study suggests that most workers truly want to get back to work; their injury is a devastating and distressing event in their lives.

“The hardest thing of my life was not being able to go back to nursing,” said one woman in Stone’s study. “That’s what I loved. I truly loved it and I was working towards my RNs, I was working and going to school, unions, Friday night and Saturday.”

“We live in a society that encourages all of us to distrust each and everybody else,” explained Stone. “We also live in a society that privileges the visible, which means that if you have any kind of invisible injury or disability, you’re automatically suspected of trying to get away with something.”

“It’s a huge problem because most disabilities aren’t visible.”

In addition to coping with their new reality, injured workers also have to deal with family members and co-workers who aren’t as understanding of their situation.

“The hardest part is when you get some co-workers saying well, ‘I wish I could be off like you’, and stuff like that,” said one man, who was a pipe fitter.

Another participant of Stone’s study, a bulldozer operator, reflected on the lack of understanding from his family.

“With my family, I think I was totally rejected, because I wasn’t working,” said the man. “My father is very traditional where, you know, you never miss a day. You work, and you work no matter whether it’s raining or, if you are sore, whatever.”

Some injured workers reported feeling abandoned by co-workers with whom they were close.

“I still don’t talk to almost all the men that worked for me for all those years,” said one construction worker. “Before that, we might well have been sitting in the bar together all evening or spent the weekend in. As soon as I was hurt, hey, you’re an outcast; you’re out of it!”

On top of all that, injured workers also have to deal with the difficult process of claims, retraining or obtaining modified duties. One participant in Stone’s study, an equipment operator with back, shoulder and neck injuries, recounted how his employer’s concept of modified duties was to have him wheel cement using a wheelbarrow.

Leslie Sanderson, a labour relations officer with the Union of National Employees, said this situation is often a product of poor medical evidence – in fact, she says it’s often the biggest hurdle to obtain proper accommodation.

“Employers, employees and unions have to rely on medical opinions,” explained Sanderson. “If your doctor isn’t familiar with the process of providing medical recommendations for accommodations, that becomes a difficult task for everyone relying on that information.”

According to Sanderson, a common difficulty is getting doctors to provide the proper information. She said employers should be sending proper letters asking for proper information, along with the employee’s job description.

“When did you see the person? What’s the prognosis for return? What are the restrictions and limitations on this person returning to work and what are the recommended accommodations? A lot of doctors do not understand what is required – and a lot of employers don’t send the job description along with this letter. The doctors really need that document to understand the worker’s position.”

But even if employees succeed in getting modified duties, they can still be faced with a lack of understanding from their co-workers. In Stone’s study, one customer service clerk shared her experience:

“My coworkers are something else,” said the woman. “They make you feel like you’re this high, cause you can’t do something. And they’ve actually voiced it. ‘Do we have to do everything around here?’… and I don’t appreciate them rubbing it in my face on top of it. Because an injury is not just – it comes with a lot of other problems that you have to deal with. So you don’t – you don’t need that. You don’t need the BS from co-workers that don’t understand it.”

Sanderson often encourages members with significant health problems to be open with their employer.

“That comes with some risks,” she cautioned. “But if you’re open with them, there seems to be more trust created. It’s easier for people to understand that.”

Sanderson believes the issue of accommodation is especially topical, given the aging demographic of society as a whole.

“Personally, I feel that we should never have to deal with accommodation issues in a grievance,” said Sanderson. “It should be a process where we’re all working together to get a worker back to work as quickly as medically possible.”

As for Professor Stone, she would like to see unions regularly educating their membership on the issue of injured workers – going beyond injury-prevention training and focusing on how to treat injured workers.

“They should be sensitising everybody to the fact that it’s not the worker’s fault that they got injured. They need the support of their co-workers. They need the support of their union. They need the support of management.”

Passing it on!

Last weekend, Krystle Harvey, a member of Local 00383 in Sturgeon Falls, Ontario, attended what could be her last union event with the PSAC. Harvey just landed a new job outside Statistics Canada, which means, in addition to saying goodbye to her great co-workers and a job that she really liked, she also has to say goodbye to the union.

“I’m going to miss the union the most because I met so many amazing people and got to do so many amazing things,” she said.

After the training session was over, Harvey took to Facebook and called on her co-workers to get involved. Her status update read in part: “I urge all my stats co-workers to become more involved in your union! Because if you won’t fight for your rights then who will?”

Harvey, a 29-year-old employee at Statistical Survey Operations, admits she didn’t always think unions were so great. In a previous workplace, her main experience with her union was seeing it protect individuals who didn’t really deserve to be protected.

But luckily for us, after getting a job at Stats, Harvey got involved with our union and her opinion quickly changed. She currently holds the position of secretary in her Local. Her involvement, she admits, was a bit of an accident. At the behest of one of her friends, Harvey signed up for a course on political and social activism.

“One of my friends said ‘come, it’ll be so much fun – we’ll have a great weekend,’” recalled Harvey. “And… my friend didn’t actually end up going.”

Nonetheless, Harvey spent the weekend learning more about the union and getting to know members of her local executive.

“It got me a lot more involved – and it got me wanting to get me more involved with this particular union.”

It should be noted that Statistical Survey Operations has a number of longstanding issues that still need to be addressed. Our members hope that this round of bargaining will lead to a much fairer workplace. Harvey believes that becoming aware of these issues helped fuel her union activism.

“I didn’t really know about the issues before I got involved. Once I got involved, I started seeing all of these issues and wanting something to be done about it.”

Last weekend’s training session allowed 11 participants to talk about these issues. Despite the training being open to all PSAC members from the North Bay and Sudbury area, the only members who showed up were from Harvey’s Local.

One member who attended felt it was a pretty sad turnout, but Harvey doesn’t quite see it that way.

“Of all the people in North Bay, of all the Locals – we were the only ones who showed up,” she said. “I think that says a lot about our Local and how involved we are – and how united we are.”

Harvey’s new job outside Stats Canada is a management position. She jokingly admits that she probably won’t be as free to praise unions.

“But I still absolutely believe in unions, regardless of where I’m going and whom I’ll be working with,” she added.

In fact, Harvey is making sure her enthusiasm for the union lives on after she’s gone. In addition to urging her co-workers to get involved, Harvey is compelling her older brother Trevor, who also works at Stats, to get involved in the union.

“I told him, ‘Trevor, my legacy has to live on; so you need to become more involved.’”

Join us in wishing Krystle the best of luck in her new career – and Trevor the best of luck in his union involvement! Leave a comment below!

SSO issues on the Hill

On May 10, MP Claude Gravelle (NDP-Nickel Belt) stood up during question period and told the House of Commons something that our members know all too well: the government is mistreating Statistical Survey Operations employees.

“This government has been nasty with science and statistical evidence. Now they are mistreating the people collecting the evidence,” said Gravelle. “I have 200 statistical survey operations staff in Sturgeon Falls, part of 1,500 across Canada, who have been without a contract for over a year.”

The PSAC is still waiting for arbitration dates, both for regional office employees, who collect data in a call centre, and for field interviewers, who work door-to-door.

Among the demands is the issue of seniority; our members want the employer to recognize seniority when assigning work hours. As things stand currently, the employer has no obligation to provide a minimum amount of hours.

In response to Gravelle’s question, Conservative MP Andrew Saxton responded: “Mr. Speaker, our government bargains in good faith.”

For more information, please consult the SSO bargaining section of the PSAC website.