National Day of Remembrance and Action on Violence Against Women – Dec. 6

stoptheviolence

Recently, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon stated that “everyone has a responsibility to prevent and end violence against women and girls, starting by challenging the culture of discrimination that allows it to continue”. For me, this statement is key for the elimination of violence against women. In my opinion, we first need to go to the root of the idea that violence against women is an acceptable or reasonable method of response. As a young girl, growing up in the Caribbean, I was raised in a culture that undeniably held boy children to a different measuring stick; this in itself began the discriminations of socializing. Violence can start from very early on, however, girls are expected to live by the credo “little girls must be seen and not heard”.

This, too, has resulted in the silencing of many little girls voices to the atrocities of hidden violence.

As I grew, I recall encounters between spouses or partners where physical violence and verbal abuse was a regular occurrence; the sight of it was “normal”. In some instances, when the police would be called, the female involved would beg the officer not to take the man, even to the point of becoming violent if the authorities persisted in the arrest.

The acceptance of violence against women is a true cultural disparity and a phenomenon that has been handed down the generations as an “accepted” practice.

With the progression of time, the females in the island have not only grown in strength but they have come together to dispel the notion that violence against women is acceptable as a cultural practice. They continue to educate themselves and fight for the elimination of violence against women. So as we recognize the International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women, remember that hope springs eternal.

___________________________________________________________

Episodes of drama and tensions noticeably present

Linking each encounter, making things unbearable

Inflicting harm and injury, causing irreparable damage

More often than not

In an effort to remove oneself

Negotiations become tenuous

And things fall apart

To the detriment of she

Everything out of reach

Vulnerable and distressed

I your target

Only knowing abuse

Live a life, a lie camouflaged

Escape appears pointless as running not even optional

Nowhere else to hide

Conditions remain stalemated

Exceptions to be expected as the end becomes inevitable

Hayley Millington is the Union of National Employees’ national equity representative for women. This article was written as part of our union’s member journalism program. If you’d like to find out more, click here – to pitch a story or for any questions, please send an email to communications@une-sen.org.

International Day for Persons with Disabilities – Dec. 3

IDPD_2014

by Michael Freeman

Not every challenge that I have faced as a person with a physical disability has been physical; some of my greatest challenges have been of the mind.

While in Ottawa for one of the recent human rights committee meetings, I was faced with one of my life-long fears. It was almost crippling for me, but no one else could even recognize that there was an issue… until I finally started sharing.

Why do I feel like I have to hide behind a cheery disposition? Why do I feel alone in my thoughts and unable to share the truth about how I am feeling?

My degenerative physical condition is leading me down a path that makes me feel, at times, helpless and hopeless, forcing me to accept that which I am powerless to change.

Even as I write, I am reluctant to share for fear of my monumental challenge being dismissed as trivial.

As the committee members and I stood in the lobby of our hotel after a long day of meetings, we discussed having supper just four short blocks from where we stood. I began to think about ways to excuse myself. I was not going to call a taxi for a distance I once walked with relative ease. I told everyone that I was too tired to attend – that I would just go to my room and order room-service. One committee member suggested that I could use a wheelchair and they volunteered to push it for me.

There it was: my fears were becoming a reality. I now needed help – mechanical help – to do something I once did with relative ease.

There before me was a wheelchair. I had a traumatically difficult decision to make: eat room service food, alone, yet again or swallow my pride and anything else that was keeping me from accepting the assistance offered.

That was the beginning of what I understood to be a very slippery slope. There would be no turning back.

In reality, I had been using assistive devices throughout my life and had never thought of them that way. I don’t know why it was harder for me to use the wheelchair, but it was. I had a real mental block that caused stress, panic and adverse emotion. I was surprised to find that some of that melted away as soon as I sat in the chair.

The mental stress of living with a physical disability has been a monkey on my back for many years. I went from a rather happy-go-lucky kid to an angry and confused teenager to an isolating and insulating adult. The mental stress almost took over at the time I wrote the poem “Self Imposed Prison”.

Self-Imposed Prison
By Michael Patrick Freeman

Here I sit
Alone at last
My thoughts are mine
But mine alone.

No one wants to know how the mind works
Or the things it thinks
When it belongs to a man
like me
Alone at last.

Here I sit
Waiting
Wanting
Searching for a reason
To leave this self imposed prison.

Times have changed for me; I am less isolated. I get involved in activities that interest and challenge me. I do less insulating because I have started to share my burden with those who will listen. I understand this world uniquely because of how I have worked through my disability, both physical and mental.

By sharing our life’s story with others, we all heal as individuals. Share your story today.

December 3 is the International Day for Persons with Disabilities; if you’d like to share your story with us, please leave a comment below.

Michael Freeman is the Union of National Employees’ national equity representative for persons with disabilities. This article was written as part of our union’s member journalism program. If you’d like to find out more, click here – to pitch a story or for any questions, please send an email to communications@une-sen.org.

Trans Day of Remembrance – Nov. 20

tdor_2014

Transgender Day of Remembrance (TDOR) occurs annually on 20 November; it’s “a day to memorialize those who have been killed as a result of transphobia or the hatred or fear of transgender and gender non-conforming people, and acts to bring attention to the continued violence endured by the transgender community”.

TDOR was founded in 1998 by Gwendolyn Ann Smith, a trans woman and activist, who wanted to memorialize Rita Hester, a trans woman who was stabbed to death in Alliston, Massachusetts. Since its inception, TDOR has been held annually on November 20th each year.

Specifically, it memorializes our dead brothers and sisters that have been killed because they dared to be themselves.

Killed because of human intolerance and bigotry.

Killed because they did not fit into someone’s viewpoint on what makes a man or a woman.

They came from all races, religions, ages and countries around the world. And they died horrible deaths – beaten to death, shot, stabbed, beheaded, run over by cars….

We remember and honour them because it is important to honour their bravery and conviction to live their lives honestly, and to be the person they were meant to be. It’s important to remember them because we all know that this could happen to us.

And we know that it is up to us to continue to fight for rights and protections that will make all of us safe.

And to stand up and say: “NO! This is not right!”

Personally, it is also a time to remember other brothers and sisters in the trans community that didn’t make it out alive for a variety of other reasons: those that could no longer live with the pain and checked out, those that died before they could complete transition and those that left us with a hole in our hearts where they used to be.

So, on November 20th, please remember my fallen brothers and sisters. Keep them in your thoughts and prayers. Attend a TDOR ceremony in your community, if you can. And support the efforts of all of those who are trying to advance the cause of getting trans rights enshrined in law, in all the countries of the world.

Let all of us help stop the killing.

Finally, as union activists, please, please get out and support the passage of Bill C-279, which would insert gender identity into the Canadian Human Rights Code and into hate crimes legislation. The bill has been passed in the House of Commons and is currently sitting in a senate committee. Contact the senators on the senate committee and tell them over and over and over again that they need to support passage of this bill in its current form.

We are your friends; we are your brothers and sisters, aunts and uncles, mothers and fathers, and even your grandparents. Help us get the same rights of all Canadians. Help us to truly take our place in this society.

Kate Hart is the Union of National Employees’ national equity representative for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people. This article was written as part of our union’s member journalism program. If you’d like to find out more, click here – to pitch a story or for any questions, please send an email tocommunications@une-sen.org.

 

UNE – Human Rights Calendar is back!

HRCalendar

The UNE Human Rights Calendar that debuted at Convention in August, is now available to all members.

The Human Rights Committee decided to create a 2015 calendar to showcase the colours of our union. The pictures represent our union, our workplace and our diversity. We also wish to thank everyone who submitted wonderful and colourful pictures we are so proud to display in our 2015 – Human Rights Calendar.

What better gift can we give ourselves than one of pride and solidarity for 2015. Calendars are still available in the component office on a first come first serve basis. Please contact your Regional Human Rights Representative if you would like to receive more.

August 14: Multiculturalism Day at the UNE

multi2014

August 14 is Multiculturalism Day at the Union of National Employees. During our last convention, our members passed a resolution to celebrate our union’s diversity each year on August 14.

We hope you take the opportunity to find out more about the rich cultural mosaic in which we live. To help you promote the occasion, we’ve created a lovely poster for you to download, print and post in your office.

 

Tribal people under attack

WID_2014

This International Day of the World’s Indigenous Peoples, Survival International is calling attention to some of the tribes who fell victim to genocide. The international organization, which advocates on behalf of tribal people worldwide, fears history could repeat itself if urgent action isn’t taken to protect a particular tribe on the Brazilian-Peruvian border.

Early last month, Survival International learned that a formerly uncontacted tribe (a tribe that had no previous contact with industrialised societies) reached out to the Ashaninka, a neighbouring tribe in Brazil.

“This uncontacted tribe said that they left their home because their elders had been massacred by non‑Indians and that all their homes had been burned,” explained Ilana Nevins, spokesperson for Survival International. “There were so many people killed that they couldn’t bury them all – that those who couldn’t be buried had been picked at by vultures.”

The organization suspects that illegal loggers and cocaine traffickers are the likely culprits of this flagrant level of violence. Many of the area’s tribal people have already been pushed further into the forest as illegal logging and drug traffickers encroach on their land.

In addition to violence, isolated tribes that come into contact with people from industrialized societies are highly susceptible to introduced diseases. In the mid 1990’s, more than half of the Nahua people were wiped out following their first contact with loggers.

Seven tribal people who made contact last month were already showing signs of influenza, a disease to which they have no acquired immunity. FUNAI, the Brazilian government body charged with protecting tribal territories and their people, treated five young men and two young women for the disease.

With 70 uncontacted tribes within its borders and 14 million hectares of land (roughly two-and-a-half times the size of Nova Scotia), FUNAI has a daunting task – and not enough funds to do it. But Nevins says things have been improving.

“There are people – FUNAI staff – that care deeply that making sure these people and this land is protected,” said Nevins. “But that’s not enough; right now, there aren’t enough funds to make sure that all the uncontacted land is being monitored – that illegal loggers, miners and other people focused on resource extraction are kept out of this land.”

Survival International would like to see the Brazilian government allocate more funds to FUNAI. At present, they are calling on the government to urgently re-staff a government outpost that was overrun in 2011 by illegal loggers and drug traffickers.

The staff there was working to monitor and protect the land where the uncontacted tribe is believed to have resided.

Survival International is asking people to sign and send an email to the Brazilian and Peruvian governments, calling on them to monitor and protect these uncontacted tribes and their land.

In March of this year, the Peruvian and Brazilian governments signed an agreement to cooperate on cross-border monitoring and protection.

“So far this has not been sufficient to ensure that these people are protected,” concluded Nevins.

Members can find out more about Survival International at www.survivalinternational.org. You may also be interested in other articles we’ve written about tribal people, including: Rethink Your Vocab and last year’s article on oil exploration encroaching on the Matsés’ land, which is located within Peruvian borders.

Learning to heal

learningtoheal

Last month, Ruby Langan organized a writing workshop focused on aboriginal awareness and healing. As UNE’s national equity representative for Aboriginal Peoples, Langan said the workshops’ participants had a very diverse range of interests.

“My intention was to get people writing and increase awareness of aboriginal human rights,” she said. “I believe that the writing process is a good way to start healing, which is a very important part of what I’m trying to accomplish.”

The workshop primarily attracted members of the aboriginal community around Vancouver. Langan said that many people are reluctant to begin writing. Participants were provided a safe, welcoming, encouraging environment and constructive feedback.

Residential schools and the foster care system have done untold damage to the links between First Nations Peoples and their culture.

“Cultural ties have been broken; people are just now trying to re-establish them,” she added.

Other topics discussed were individual healing journeys, drinkable water, human rights, marriage in traditional aboriginal societies, and environmental protection.

“I was amazed that we could have such a diverse range of interests and expertise in the workshop participants.”

“Many of us could benefit from healing,” concluded Langan. “I am on a healing journey. I am on a learning journey. Aren’t we all?”

“The relationship between Canada and First Nations is ever-changing. We can bring together learners and teachers and empower our members – aboriginal and non-aboriginal.”

Around the same time, the PSAC regional office in Quebec also provided a two-day training session on aboriginal issues. Julie Dubois, an assistant regional vice-president in Quebec, couldn’t wait to participate.

“As a young woman of aboriginal origin, I have a tremendous drive to learn more about the realities of Aboriginal Peoples in Canada,” explained Dubois. “It’s important to me to be able to debunk and challenge the myths surrounding aboriginal people.”

Dubois pointed out that most people know very little about aboriginal communities, other than the disinformation that takes place in the media.

Magali Picard, regional executive vice-president for the PSAC’s Quebec region, took the opportunity to deliver a speech that blew away the room.

“It’s as if her words came out as flaming arrows – she has an energy that is completely hypnotising and a charisma that could capsize any enemy,” declared Dubois.

A subject that frequently made its appearance was the Idle No More movement – and how allies can support its cause. Participants were even treated to a video that put the spotlight on the co-founders of the movement’s Quebec branch.

Another noteworthy moment was a heartfelt testimonial by Viviane Michel, who heads Quebec Native Women Inc. She touched on a host of challenges that aboriginal women grapple with, including the lack of resources, difficult financial situations, single mothers and the differences in language, among others.

Another important topic was the troubling number of missing and murdered aboriginal women. Michel also took the opportunity to mention that an equally troubling number of aboriginal men are missing. VICE recently reported that Six Nations Journalist Jen MtPleasant has compiled a database of over 600 missing or murdered aboriginal men in Canada.

The number of missing and murdered native women is estimated to be anywhere from 600 to 4,000; the range is indicative of a systematic problem when it comes to law enforcement collecting racial data.

In the end, Dubois said she left the training with new convictions with respect to aboriginal solidarity. Eager to share her experience, she wrote a two-page report that she intends to share with her region.

“While I’ve satisfied my thirst for knowledge, I can tell you that I still have a really strong desire to learn more – I can feel it in my veins!

 

 

 

Canadian Multiculturalism Day – June 27

CNDMULTI

By Amit Deo

Early 1980s: I’m at my father’s side in a large superstore’s pharmacy. We have just come from the emergency room. In the car, my mother is running an alarmingly high fever, awaiting the prescription to pull her back from acute danger. Frustrated and rather demandingly, my father asks the pharmacist who made an error in preparing my mother’s prescription to quickly remake the batch. The man in line behind us grows impatient. Assuming the mistake was ours and not realizing the urgency in this, he starts berating my father.

“Hurry the fuck up, you fucking Paki!”

Unbeknownst to him, my father doesn’t back down from confrontation easily, or rather, at all. This conversation is then, as they say, “taken outside”. In the parking lot, my father and this man verbally collide. The man screams a stream of obscenities and other classic slanders.

“You don’t even belong here. Go back to your own fucking country!”

My father, at this point, is basically looking for an opening to use his fists rather than his words. My poor mother, leaning out of the car window, is barely lucid and sobbing – but she musters the energy to tell my father to get back into the car.

As an eight year old boy at the time, I was standing on the curb, nervous and confused, crying my eyes out. Innocently though, as an undercurrent of thought, wondered if the word “Paki” had something to do with Pac Man – which I loved – but simply out of context, figured it did not.

Fast-forward to 2014: I’m at a crowded Thai restaurant with friends; the place is filled with people from all ethnic backgrounds. I can hear the waitress taking the order of the table next to us. Everyone at the table is an ethnic minority. The server, racially visible herself, finishes her task and leaves. The table then starts poking fun at the server; they are being very judgemental and critical. They mock her accent and her ethnicity. They don’t hesitate to make many negative assumptions about a woman they have never met before.

The first example I shared with you is a rather typical experience that I’m sure many racially visible people have faced; being criticized by another who’s not part of the minority. This is, and was, not uncommon, especially in years past and in rural communities. In my second example, we have different ethnic minority groups, one being critical of the other. Both groups are equally Canadian; both, I’m sure, experienced similar struggles in this country and yearn for a better a life.

Canada embraced a multiculturalism policy in 1971; it was a huge victory in the movement towards equality. Yet, as American philosopher John Dewey once said, “Arriving at one goal is the starting point to another”.

Many of us may see ourselves as equal, yet choose to not view others as equal to us. Canadians may have a hard time defining our national identity, but at the core, we are just that: Canadians.

Whether our origins are found in France, Poland, India or Japan, we ultimately found our way here for the betterment of ourselves, our families and our future generations. That is what we have in common, and what we know can be achieved in our country. Retaining our mother cultures is difficult, but vitally important. Equally important, however, is accepting and adopting the culture and identity of the country we live in. Being a citizen of this country gives us equal rights, but also demands equal responsibility.

Multiculturalism in Canada does not just mean accepting other cultures, races, and religions – it means accepting each of them as equal to our own. Multiculturalism isn’t just about sharing our foods and traditions with each other. It’s about standing together for equality. Canada is not a country that yields to intolerance, yet injustices still occur and many still choose to ignore that they do.

However subtle or blatant, discrimination is a common occurrence. We read headlines on a daily basis that  report on the state of countries where similar ethnic groups are at war with each other, intolerant of each other; Ukraine, Sudan, Korea, Libya. As diverse Canadians, we have to set the standard. We are no better if we cannot accept each other as one.

Our differences are what make us stronger.

Our acceptance of each other should be the model to be mirrored by other countries.

Through acceptance, not judgement, we achieve wholeness. Multiculturalism is equality.

Diversity is continually rising in Canada. We are at a verge of either being a country that treats one another with respect and dignity, or one that keeps ourselves guarded with our differences at arm’s length: pockets of groups not willing to share or let each other in. We should feel like we can walk into any place in this country. Whether that be the newest trendy steak house, or the little hole in the wall Chinese noodle restaurant.

We should not feel judged solely based on how we look. We may not have to agree on everything, but we have to accept and respect one another. Wouldn’t you agree? Well, maybe we can discuss this further over some dim sum. Join me?

Amit Deo is the alternate to the UNE’s national equity representative for racially visible people. If you’d like to take him up on the dim sum, you’ll have to meet him in Coquitlam, British Columbia where he is also the local president of composite Local 20088.

[Editor’s note: There are many schools of thought when it comes to including profanity in articles. The Canadian Press Stylebook points out that “profanity that is used for its own sake does not enlighten a reader” – and we absolutely agree. However, it also states that there are exceptions: “a profanity might be essential to an accurate understanding of the facts or emotions that are driving a story.” In this case, we chose to include the profanity to give readers an accurate portrayal of the vitriol that equity-seeking groups often face.]

Duty to accommodate and medical marijuana

dta_mari

The duty-to-accommodate doesn’t make the news very often, but it did last week in an Ottawa Citizen article examining whether the use of medical marijuana could force the return of smoking rooms.

“In an era of smoking bans on patios, parks and restaurants, the notion may seem absurd, but those relying on marijuana to ease chronic pain and other conditions may soon be demanding accommodation for their medically prescribed and commercially grown medication.”

Medical marijuana use has been on the rise since it was first legalized in 2001. In just over a decade, the number of Canadians authorized to possess medical marijuana has jumped from 477 in 2002 to 37,359 in 2013. Health Canada projects the number to rise to 58,000 in 2014 and skyrocket to 450,000 in another ten years.

It’s no wonder some labour experts are predicting that this will become a big issue – one that is already sparking debate.

Last year, an RCMP officer made headlines when his employer told him he couldn’t smoke his legally prescribed marijuana while in uniform. The officer has been using the drug to help him calm down and treat his PTSD symptoms.

The RCMP felt that smoking in public or while in uniform would “not portray the right message to the general public.”

The use of medical marijuana poses a complex issue for employers, who have to grapple with the duty to accommodate on one side; public perception and health and safety on the other.

Given its long history of being a controlled substance, users of medical marijuana have to combat a certain level of stigma associated with the drug. The Canadian Association of Medical Cannabis Dispensaries hopes that discussions like these will help shift the public perception of marijuana from illicit drug to medicine.

On the health and safety front, some employers may be concerned about a person’s ability to safety and effectively perform their work while taking the drug. It’s important that these employees are not endangering their safety or that of others. In the future, it may be possible for patients to obtain “designer marijuana”; strains of the drug designed to treat specific symptoms without affecting cognitive and motor skills.

But these issues don’t negate the employer’s duty to accommodate these individuals to the point of undue hardship. Fundamentally, these are people who are merely treating a disability.

So, will the duty to accommodate lead to smoking rooms? It could: the cost of establishing a smoking room doesn’t constitute undue hardship. In other cases, a person’s accommodation needs could easily be addressed by simply offering more frequent breaks.

In an article for Occupational Safety Canada, Cheryl Edwards offers a few tips for employers. Among them, she suggests working “with the employee, his union representative and medical professionals to determine what checks and balances will need to be in place to ensure the employee, co-workers, the public and the environment are properly safeguarded.”

Finally, she recommends not getting distracted by the drug causing the impairment, but to focus on the issue of impairment instead.

“Treat this source the same as you would any other prescription drug.”

June: National Aboriginal History Month

natabmonth

In 1939, thirteen Native people participating in a conference on First Nation welfare took a bold stand. While other delegates busied themselves passing resolutions urging greater attention to the plight of aboriginal communities, the Indian delegation defected to pass a resolution of their own.

The Toronto-Yale Conference on the North American Indian seemed very well-intentioned. Over seventy delegates participated in the two-week affair. Among them were Canadian and American academics, missionaries and government officials.1 Thirteen Native people were invited, among them an Iroquois anthropologist, a Cherokee missionary, a Haida United Church minister and a Six Nations lawyer. The Indian delegation also included Edith Brant Monture; the great-great-granddaughter of famous Iroquois Chief Joseph Brant.2

The conference was designed “to reveal the conditions today of the white man’s Indian wards, and in a scientific, objective and sympathetic spirit, plan with them for their future.” 3

For all of its good intensions, the non-aboriginal conference participants assumed that assimilation was both beneficial and inevitable.

“The guiding belief was that the Indian peoples were to be the recipients of change, not the choosers. In standard colonial parlance, they were variously described as wards or children. It was, however, colonialism with a difference, for the goal was not independence, but disappearance.”4

Since assimilation was viewed as inevitable, the only debates centered on how fast it should happen.

The crackpot ideas machine went into overdrive when Diamond Jenness, a Canadian anthropologist, suggested establishing small colonies of Inuit around major Canadian cities. Because, you know, who wants to live in the North? The anthropologist believed that the Inuit would be better off learning English and marketable skills in southern Canada rather than inevitably becoming unemployed, welfare-dependant and demoralized in the North.5

On the last day of the conference, a resolution was passed calling for greater awareness of “the psychological, social and economic maladjustments of the Indian populations of the United States and Canada.” Then a committee was formed to determine how the conference’s findings should be disseminated. 6

“And then a very dramatic defection took place. The Indian delegates broke from the main group and met separately to pass their own resolutions. […]

While appreciative of their invitation to the conference, the Indians resolved to have their own meetings. They didn’t need government officials, missionaries [or] white sympathizers […] to speak for them.”7

The Native delegates called for an “all-Indian conference on Indian affairs,” comprising of only “bona fide Indian leaders actually living among the Indian people of the reservations and reserves”. Such a conference, they implored, ought to be “free of political, anthropological, missionary, administrative, or other domination.”8

Their bold move, their call to action and the conference overall went largely unnoticed; by the time the event was over, Canada was already one week into its World War 2.


[1] Francis, R. D., & Jones, R. (1988). Destinies: Canadian history since Confederation. Toronto: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston of Canada.

[2] A Cassidy, F. (1991). Aboriginal self-determination: proceedings of a conference held September 30-October 3, 1990. Lantzville, BC: Oolichan Books.

[3] Francis, R. D., & Jones, R. (1988). Destinies: Canadian history since Confederation. Toronto: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston of Canada.

[4] Cairns, A. (2000). Citizens plus: aboriginal peoples and the Canadian state. Vancouver: UBC Press.

[5] Idem

[6] Francis, R. D., & Jones, R. (1988). Destinies: Canadian history since Confederation. Toronto: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston of Canada.

[7] Cassidy, F. (1991). Aboriginal self-determination: proceedings of a conference held September 30-October 3, 1990. Lantzville, BC: Oolichan Books.

[8] Francis, R. D., & Jones, R. (1988). Destinies: Canadian history since Confederation. Toronto: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston of Canada.